Monday, 18 March 2013

The ruling on HS2, and the situation in Cyprus


The banking situation in Cyprus has hit the headlines over the weekend, with a 10 billion euro bailout plan thrashed out by the Cypriot government, European Commission and European Central Bank, and agreed by the EU and the IMF. The deal currently on the table will see all those with Cypriot bank accounts forced to pay a levy of 6.75% on sums less than 100,000 euros, and 9.9% on those over.

 

Opposition leader George Lillikas has argued that President Anastasiades has “betrayed the people’s vote”. Given that this is a deal that will have a devastating impact on citizens (with the burden placed very directly on the citizens), and was agreed by institutions without the consent of the people, I can’t help but agree.

 

This levy will also affect non-Cypriot citizens too, including UK expats. While George Osborne has pledged to compensate any UK government employees and military personnel in Cyprus, no such support will be available for other Britons. At the moment, it seems depositors in the overseas arms of Cypriot banks will be safe.

 

Fears are growing that investor confidence in the eurozone will be shattered by this deal and the uncertainty in Cyprus, forcing the nation to leave the Euro, which will of course have an effect on the rest of us. And clearly, this turmoil provides yet another reason why we should leave the EU.

 

Last Friday saw Mr Justice Ouseley rule on judgements over the HS2 plans. Unfortunately, the ruling went in the government’s favour on 9 out of the 10 points, and the government now says they will “press ahead without delay” after what they describe as a “landmark victory”.

 

One positive to take from the ruling is that the consultation into compensation for those affected was deemed to be so “unfair as to be unlawful”, and the Department for Transport will now hold another property consultation which should see those affected given fairer compensation settlements.  Many groups have also stated that they will appeal the decision.

 

Rail Minister Simon Burns still claims that the “project is in the national interest”, but I wholeheartedly disagree for numerous reasons, as I have made publically clear. I am concerned about the effect on people’s homes and the countryside. The planned rail line runs through beautiful countryside and some of the best sites in Britain for wildlife. I believe, as do many others, that the projected passenger demand is unrealistic and ordinary rail users will find themselves unable to afford the increased fares. HS2 would also not ease overcrowding issues on some lines until 2026, and money could be spent delivering more effective and immediate results. For more information on where I stand on HS2, please visit my blog (http://nikkisinclairemep.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/HS2) and website (http://yourmep.org/hs2.html).

 

I plan to continue the fight against HS2 and to support those also campaigning against it. While this ruling is a disappointment and a setback, this will not deter me from opposing these government plans.